|
PREVIOUS LEARNING
|
TARGETED LEARNING |
FUTURE LEARNING |
|
Compare,
contrast, analyze and evaluate connections between
information and relationship in various fiction and
nonfiction works; text ideas and own experiences, and text
ideas and the world by analyzing the relationship between
literature and its historical period and culture.
|
|
Making
connections in literature and life are imperative for
success in future endeavors. |
|
Apply
post-reading strategies to identify the
main idea and supporting details. |
R1H
Apply the post-reading skills to
identify and explain the relationship between the main idea
and supporting details
|
Apply
post-reading skills to comprehend text.
|
|
Locate
and explain information in illustrations, titles, headings,
captions, diagrams, charts, and graphs.
|
R3A Locate and interpret
key
information in illustrations,
title, chapter headings, table
of contents, charts, diagrams and
maps to answer
questions |
Apply
information in chapter headings, table of contents and
glossary features to answer questions to comprehend text.
|
|
Identify and explain author’s use of rhythm, rhyme
and alliteration in nonfiction text. |
R3B
Explain examples of sensory
details and
figurative language
within the context
of nonfiction
text |
Interpret and explain figurative language in
nonfiction text.
|
|
Use
details from the text to answer questions, identify main
ideas, retell sequence of events, and make
inferences. |
R3C Make inferences about
problems
and solutions using details from the
text.
|
Use
details from the text to make predictions, make
inferences, distinguish between fact and opinion,
and explain author’s purpose. |
|
Write
expository text, with assistance, with a main idea
and supporting details. |
W3C
Write expository text with a main
idea and three or more supporting
details |
Write
expository and persuasive paragraphs with a main
idea or point to prove, three or more supporting
details, and a concluding sentence. |
Teacher
Reflection
-
As I reflect on the
unit, to what extent were the students productively engaged in the
work? How do I know?
-
Did the unit allow
for students to engage in activities and learning situations which
were consistent with the district’s curriculum guide?
-
What feedback did I
receive from students indicating they achieved understanding and
that the objectives were met for this unit?
-
Did I adjust my
goals or my work as I taught the lesson? Why? How?
-
What specific
elements of the assignments did students have the most difficulty
with? What could be done to enhance student learning for these
specific skills?
-
If I had the
opportunity to teach this unit again to the same group of students,
what would I do differently?
-
If there were one
thing from this lesson that I could share with a colleague, what
would it be?
Bibliography
(2000).
Language and literature. Evanston, IL: McDougall, Littell.
Department
of Secondary and Elementary. Communication arts glossary.
Available online at http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/curriculum/GLE/10.29.04GLOSSARY.pdf
Dickinson,
E. (1865) “XXIV” (“A narrow fellow in the grass”).
Retrieved April 10, 2005 from
http://members.fortunecity.com/Itpoetry/dickinson.htm
Harmon, W., C. Thrall and H. Holman. (1999). A handbook to
literature. New York: Prentice
Hall.
Kagan,
S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Resources of
Teachers,
Inc.
Kennedy, X., D. Gioia and M. Bauerlein.
(2004). Handbook of literary terms: Literature, language, theory.
Lebanon, IN: Pearson Longman.
Miller, E. “Biography of Vlad the
Impaler”. Available online at
http://www.vladtheimpaler.com
Munch, E. (1893). The scream.
Retrieved May 4, 2005 from
http://www.art.com
Poe,
E. (1846). “The cask of amontillado.” Retrieved April 10, 2004 from
http://www.gutenberg.org
Rosten, Leo. (n.d.) “Cemetery path.”
Retrieved April 22, 2005 from
www.eduref.org/cgi-bin/printlessons.cgi/Virtual/Lessons/Language_Arts/Reading/RDG0001.html
Stagg,
J. (1820). “The vampyre.” Retrieved April 5, 2005 from
www.litgothic.com/Texts/vampyre.html
Stoker.B. (1897). Dracula.
Retrieved May 4, 2005 from
www.mercurytheatre.info
Wells,
H. (1898). War of the worlds. Retrieved May 4, 2005 from
http://waroftheworlds.org/Default.aspx?tabid=106 (printed script)
Wells, H. (1898). War of the worlds.
Retrieved May 4, 2005 from
www.mercurytheatre.info (audio version)
Wilhelm, J. (2001). Improving
comprehension with think aloud strategies: Modeling what good readers
do. New York: Scholastic.
Yeats, W. (1933). “Oil and blood.”
Retrieved May 4, 2005 from
http://www.lib.umd.edu/ETC/ReadingRoom/Poetry/Yeats/oil-and-blood