|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Please turn off your cell phones or other devices or turn them to
vibrate.
|
|
3
|
- Introduce the Missouri Improvement Planning Process
- Provide districts the tools to complete a structured Improvement Plan
|
|
4
|
- Allowable Expenditures- p. 55-56
- Exemplar Improvement Plan- p. 57-69
- List of Approvable Programs- p. 79
- Scoring Guide- p. 80-84
- Sample District Data- p. 85-91
|
|
5
|
- We will cover the five components of the Improvement Planning Process
and complete activities to help you understand the process.
|
|
6
|
- For Self-Study Districts- Improvement Plan must be submitted to DESE by
5:00 PM on March 3, 2008.
- For districts applying for grants-
- Must submit a letter of intent to DESE by 5:00 PM on January 7, 2008.
- Plan must be submitted to DESE by 5:00 PM on March 3, 2008.
|
|
7
|
- Uses a scoring guide and assigns points depending on the quality of the
information assessed by that particular indicator
- Points range from 0 (item not included) to 3 for most indicators
- Some only receive 0 or 3 points and are considered “deal-breakers” for
that indicator
- If each indicator is addressed in the plan, it should lead to a good
plan
|
|
8
|
- Needs Assessment
- Objectives
- Strategies
- Resources (required for grant applications)
- Budget (required for grant applications)
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Data and systems analysis
- Identify strengths and concerns
- Build a plan that includes activities that will address what is not
working
- Avoid “random acts of improvement”
|
|
11
|
- Should be developed prior to beginning needs assessment process
- Should include stakeholders from multiple areas, including regular and
special education, teachers and administrators, and parents and
community members. Should also
include someone who understands data
- In the needs assessment, the stakeholder group should be listed and
include the disciplines (not names) of group members
|
|
12
|
- Take 5 minutes to determine who would be relevant stakeholders you may
wish to invite to participate in your stakeholder group.
- Remember that the group must include district staff and administration
in both regular and special education and community members/ parents who
would be able to provide input.
|
|
13
|
- Uses a data analysis methodology and drilldown process to identify
needed areas of improvement.
- Based upon this, the stakeholder group develops hypotheses as to why the
areas are of concern.
- The group then prioritizes areas of need for the district.
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Determines where to focus improvement efforts.
- Includes other information, such as stakeholder input.
|
|
16
|
- Data Drilldown
- Selection of SPP Indicators
- Development of Hypotheses of Root Causes
- Identification of Needs based on Hypothesized Root Causes
- Prioritization of Needs in Order of Importance
|
|
17
|
- Describes the stakeholder group including how all recommended
stakeholders (parents, general education, special education and
community) are involved in the analysis, planning, implementation and
evaluation process
- Methodology of drilldown process and data sources used are appropriate
and described in sufficient detail
- Hypotheses are developed to identify causes for the poor performance.
- Based upon the hypotheses developed the needs of the district are
identified and prioritized
|
|
18
|
- 1) Scan data for accuracy.
- 2) Compare your data with SPP targets established by the State.
- 3) Take a careful look at data that have been summarized to identify relationships
and trends.
- 4) Disaggregate data. That is, take summary data and break it down into
smaller groups.
- p. 73
|
|
19
|
- Concentrate on priorities.
- Recognize Differences within Special Education Populations
- Consider “Cell Size”— “slicing and dicing” too many ways can lead to
very small cell sizes.
|
|
20
|
- My district has a high dropout rate.
- What data sources are available?
- Screen 12 exit data, discipline data, school policies, family/community
information, GPA, credits earned, programs available and utilized,
transition plans, exit surveys, etc.
|
|
21
|
- My district has a high dropout rate.
- WHO are the dropouts?
- Dropout rates by disability category
- Dropout prevalence by disability category
- Dropouts by age
- Dropouts by race
|
|
22
|
- Once the stakeholder group has drilled down the data and determined what
SPP areas are problematic, then the team needs to hypothesize “what is
contributing to the low (or high in case of dropout rate) scores?”
- These are called “root causes.”
|
|
23
|
- My district has a high dropout rate.
- WHY are they dropping out?
- Number of credits as juniors low
- District attendance policy
- Discipline rate high with lots of suspensions
- Lack of work experience programs to meet the needs of those dropping
out
|
|
24
|
- Look at the data from the State Performance Plan (SPP) indicators. What does it tell you? What is met and not met for the sample
data provided on page 85 in the manual?
The SPP Indicators and Targets are on page 70-72.
- What hypothesized root causes could you develop based upon this
data? We know this will be
limited.
|
|
25
|
- Once the hypotheses are established, the group must determine the needs
of the district based upon the hypotheses and then prioritize the needs
in order from greatest to least need.
|
|
26
|
- What do stakeholders have to say?
- What has been the pattern in the past?
- What are your resources?
- What is “reasonable” improvement?
- What constitutes a realistic time frame for improvement?
|
|
27
|
- Look at the exemplar Improvement Plan on page 57 and the Scoring Guide
on page 80
- Take 5 minutes and use the information from the Scoring Guide to “score”
the Needs Assessment portion of the Improvement Plan
|
|
28
|
- Objectives are the goals that you will work to achieve
- These must be aligned with the SPP indicators that your district has not
met for self-study districts
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- Should be targeted- but, one objective can impact more than one SPP
indicator.
- Target “key” objectives that can impact multiple indicators
- Must be based upon the priorities identified by the Stakeholder group
during the Needs Assessment
- Should be realistic
- Objectives should be ambitious, but manageable
|
|
31
|
- The objective is Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results Oriented, and
Time-Bound (a SMART goal)
- Intermediate and final targets are specified and dates by which they
will be achieved are specified
- The SPP Indicators that the objective will address are specified
|
|
32
|
- Have 5 components
- Measurable baseline
- Measurable target
- A specific time frame
- Specificity about what is being assessed
- Specificity about the method of assessment
|
|
33
|
- The Anywhere School District will increase the percent of students with
disabilities in grade 3 who score in the Advanced/ Proficient levels on
the MAP Communication Arts from 15% to 60% by the 2010-2011 school year.
- P. 57
|
|
34
|
- In the IMACS system, the objectives section includes:
- Purpose of the objective (grant, self-assessment, etc.)
- Objective
- Baseline data, trends, intermediate targets, and targets
- Monitoring of objective
- SPP Indicators addressed
|
|
35
|
- Trends- past performance measured over time
- Baseline- level of performance at the “start” of data collection (before
implementation of strategy)
- Intermediate Target- targets you want to achieve along the way between
the baseline and the target year
- Target- the desired level of performance to be reached
|
|
36
|
- Scheduled monitoring of progress towards meeting the target for the
objective is included.
- Monitoring procedures describe ongoing data collection, analysis, and interpretation
methods.
- The monitoring procedures allow for adjustments if ongoing evaluation
indicates a need for adjustment.
|
|
37
|
- Evaluation procedures align directly to the objective
- It is clearly stated when reports with respect to outcomes will be made
and to whom
- Evaluation procedures occur with sufficient frequency
|
|
38
|
- Some questions to consider when monitoring an objective include:
- What if we are not making the progress we expected—what will we do?
- How will our team demonstrate accountability- in other words that the
strategy is being implemented as planned?
|
|
39
|
- Better than expected progress is being made-was the objective too easy
to reach?
- Satisfactory progress is being made-ongoing monitoring should occur to
track progress.
- Less than satisfactory progress is being made-was the objective set too
high or do we need to change the strategy?
|
|
40
|
- Turn to the Writing Objectives resource on page 50. Using this resource and the scoring
guide, write an objective that would be appropriate based upon the data
drilldown you completed. Be sure
to include ways you could monitor the outcome.
- Using the scoring guide (p. 80) score the objective you wrote and also
score the exemplar objectives section.
|
|
41
|
- Once you have determined which objectives you need to address based upon
your data, you need to decide what strategies (interventions) would be
best to implement to meet your objectives
- The strategies selected must be either research or evidence-based
- If you are applying for a grant, DESE has a list of approved strategies
that they are willing to fund that are based upon 3-tiered models of
intervention (P. 79)
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
- Available on Page 54
- Funding requests can be for both Elementary Achievement and Transition
- Can ask for funds for CA, Math, or Behavioral Interventions
- Elementary Achievement- K-8 ONLY if strategy selected progresses up from
elementary school. Emphasis at
lower grade levels
|
|
44
|
- Transition grants- used for Middle/Jr. High through High School
- Grants are competitive and limited in number.
- Once submitted to DESE, no corrections can be made- so make sure it is
well-written, as the best grant applications will have the best chance
at funding.
- Awards based on the size of the district (see Page 44)
|
|
45
|
- List of allowable programs is provided
- Priority given to applications to fund implementation of three-tiered
models
- Districts who have previously received DESE grants may apply to expand a
program if it is on the approvable list or a evidence based
justification is provided
- Funding primarily used for professional development
- Funds can not be used to supplant current District funding
|
|
46
|
- Determine which research or evidence- based strategy would meet the need
of the objective and fit with the district
- Build in fidelity checks to ensure that the strategy is implemented as
written
- Develop a thorough list of Action Steps required to fully implement all
parts of the strategy and provide follow-up
- Determine timelines needed to complete the tasks
|
|
47
|
- The strategy is allowable and is aligned with the objective
- District personnel responsible for supervision of the strategy are
clearly identified by role and/or name
- The rationale describes how the strategy matches district prioritized
needs and is linked to identified root causes.
- The rationale describes the level of staff buy-in for implementation of
the strategy
|
|
48
|
- According to IDEA 2004, it…
- Employs systematic, empirical methods.
- Involves data analyses to test a stated hypothesis.
- The measurements used are reliable and valid.
- Uses experimental or quasi-experimental designs.
- Is accepted by a peer reviewed journal.
|
|
49
|
- Very few interventions now meet these rigorous standards. Instead, may need to use
evidence-based interventions
- Evidence-based interventions are those that are based on sound research
and have had sufficient research conducted with the intervention to
suggest it would make a significant difference toward achieving your
goal (objective)
- Must select activities that meet the standard of being either research
or evidence-based. p. 57
|
|
50
|
- Must provide justification as to how the strategy selected will work to
help meet the identified needs in the district.
- Must include information about teacher or district buy-in.
- For districts who choose strategies outside of the Approvable list, must
provide the research basis.
|
|
51
|
- Break the intervention into its components:
- Task analysis: Start at the beginning, don’t stop until the end
- Include: Start-up, improvement strategy, impact evaluation
- Provide a brief description of each action step (exactly what will be
done)
- Include projected Start Date/End Date
- Identify the specific person responsible for each action step and their
role
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
- Must include every step needed to implement the strategy. These include:
- Planning of training
- Training
- Implementation of strategy
- Strategy Impact Measures
- Follow-up fidelity of implementation check points
- Reporting to responsible party in the district and to DESE (as
required)
|
|
54
|
- The action steps provide a logical sequence from planning to
implementation and evaluation of the strategy and are specific enough to
ensure effective implementation of the strategy
- Implementation fidelity checks are included as an action step
- The personnel responsible for implementation are identified as well as
projected starting dates
|
|
55
|
- Provides a logical sequence of steps from: Planning to Implementation
to Evaluation
- Is realistic given the resources available for implementation.
|
|
56
|
- Questions include:
- What steps are needed to complete strategy?
- How long will each step take?
- Who will be responsible for each step?
- What data collection steps need to be built in?
- When should reports be generated and to whom are they given?
- Be sure the timeline is realistic
|
|
57
|
- Required by NCLB and DESE
- Training should be continuous and an integral part of the educational
program and all school activities
- Should include follow-up training and consultation by a coach as an
Action Step
- Strategy training should be incorporated as part of the district
professional development plan
|
|
58
|
- Must assess the progress of students once the strategy is implemented
- Data collected frequently enough to provide information about needed
mid-strategy changes
- Measures must also be included to evaluate the fidelity of
implementation
|
|
59
|
- Impact measures should be sensitive enough to detect increments of
change
- Collect objective and quantifiable data and not just qualitative
information- can be as simple as a frequency or a percentage
- Use measures that are reliable and valid
|
|
60
|
- Degree to which planned strategies are implemented as designed
- Must include steps in your planning to ensure that the strategy is
correctly implemented, or your success rate will be much lower
|
|
61
|
- Choose evidence-based strategies
- Select strategies that are acceptable to the implementers, positive,
have perceived effectiveness, and match the characteristics of the
instructional environment
- Choose pivotal, “keystone” strategies
- Use feedback from your stakeholders
|
|
62
|
- Use high-quality professional development
- Assign a coach from the district
- Use guided practice and feedback
- Build in points during the year for data analysis to look at progress
toward the objective
|
|
63
|
- Incorporate fidelity checks or strategy monitoring devices
- Self-reports should not be the sole check- not always accurate
- Objective observations may also be important
|
|
64
|
- Impact measures allow for a determination of whether the strategy is
implemented as intended (i.e., strategy fidelity/ program integrity)
- Impact measures include objective, quantifiable data as well as related
qualitative data and are sufficiently sensitive to detect small
increments of change
|
|
65
|
- What are some ways you can think to build fidelity checks or
implementation measures into activities in your district?
|
|
66
|
- Take one of the programs or evidence-based practices from the Approvable
list (P. 79)
- Develop a list of the action steps needed for the first year and the
timelines for beginning and completing each step
- Develop 2 possible student progress measures and 2 possible fidelity
implementation measures
- Take 15 minutes for this activity
|
|
67
|
- Web-based system that allows districts to maintain an improvement plan
and submit monitoring information to DESE
- Here we will provide an on-line demonstration of the IMACS system
|
|
68
|
- Programming changes to IMACS are in progress on both the improvement
plan and the compliance file review.
- Self-assessment districts should NOT access IMACS until notified by the
Compliance Section
- Grant districts should NOT access IMACS until notified via SELS. Access will be granted when changes
are completed and the letter of intent is received
|
|
69
|
- The resource and budget sections of the Improvement Plan are only
required for districts who will be applying for grants.
- If you have no intention of applying for any of the grant funds, you may
leave at this time.
- Remember- any District can apply for a grant, so you may want to stay!
|
|
70
|
- Includes all resources that are available and needed.
- Should incorporate all resources that would be required to implement the
strategy with fidelity and monitor the progress
|
|
71
|
- Resources currently available and needed to support implementation of
the strategy are identified and include resources outside and/or inside
of the district
|
|
72
|
|
|
73
|
- Initial resource information gathering phase based upon proposal for
improvement plan.
- Considerations include…
- Number of students on which improvement strategy is intended to have
an impact
- Intensity and frequency of proposed strategies
|
|
74
|
- Resources include…
- Personnel
- Supplies & Materials
- Professional & Technical Services (training, consultants, etc.)
|
|
75
|
- Develop the specific details as to each resource necessary to
effectively carry out each aspect of the strategy.
- For each sub-task clearly specify the specific resources needed:
- What resources are needed? Operationally define them
- How much of the identified resources are needed (e.g., number of hours,
number of curricula or books)?
|
|
76
|
- What and how much training will be necessary to implement the
improvement strategy? Consider…
- Training for LEA professional personnel (e.g., supervisory, front line)
- Training for Non-LEA professional personnel
- Training for non-professional staff and volunteer training
|
|
77
|
- What technical assistance will be needed?
- Who is best qualified to conduct training and technical assistance?
|
|
78
|
- Will outside resources be necessary to carry out evaluation activities
to determine program effectiveness? Consider…
- How much time will be needed to collect the measures?
- Who is best qualified to conduct the evaluation?
|
|
79
|
- Sustainability: To keep going or maintained in the future
- In most cases, effective improvement activities will need to be
continued if improvements are to be sustained
- Develop strategies to ensure that effective improvement activities can
be sustained over a prolonged period
|
|
80
|
- The district indicates how the strategy will be sustained following
completion of the grant
|
|
81
|
- Using resource requirements and information about the resources
currently available and allowable, develop a complete draft budget for
the improvement strategy.
- Include all resources needed in this budget.
|
|
82
|
- Develop a plan to acquire the additional resources that are needed:
- State Improvement Grant
- Local foundation funding
- In-kind LEA contribution
- Community volunteers
- Student volunteers
|
|
83
|
- Break down budget into following sections and estimate/provide costs for
each section:
- Purchased Services
- Salaries
- Supplies & Materials
|
|
84
|
- Enrollment Amount of Grant
- Below 2,499 $15,000
- 2,500 to 4,999 $17,500
- 5,000 to 14,999 $25,000
- 15,000 to 30,000 $50,000
- 30,000 + $75,000
|
|
85
|
- The budget includes only approvable expenses
- Budget is aligned with action steps, impact measures, and needed
resources
- Budget is detailed enough to outline all expected costs.
|
|
86
|
- Funds may not be used to supplant existing funds
- Only allowable expenditures can be included
- Include all resources for which you are requesting funding
- Funding request for 1st year must not exceed the allowable
grant amount
- Break request down according to the budgetary codes provided on the
Allowable Expenditures list (P. 55)
|
|
87
|
- Funds not provided to fund FTE’s for personnel
- Stipends for existing teachers to complete work on strategy activities
or training outside of school hours is allowable
- Substitute teacher pay is also allowed for district personnel to attend
trainings, follow- up consultation, or other strategy implementation
activities
|
|
88
|
- Budget must be very thorough
- Must include all costs associated with training (estimated number of
persons trained, number of days, what training is for [Ex: RtI, CBM],
and name of trainer if known)
- For supplies, must include number of items to be purchased and cost per
item
- For consultants, name of person is needed, as is the amount of time
required for consulting and the purpose (Ex: follow-up for RtI
implementation)
|
|
89
|
- If applying for grants in both areas, the budgets must be written
separately.
- For example, if the district wants to apply to implement RtI in K-12,
you must write separate objectives, strategies, resources, and budgets
for elementary achievement and transition funds, as the budget amounts
only apply to one area. Cannot
combine the two areas.
- Therefore, you have to break the costs down to what would be needed for
elementary and what would be needed for middle/ high school.
|
|
90
|
- There are limits placed on two areas of allowable items:
- Student incentives will be limited to no more than 5% of the total
budget
- Food or meal requests will be capped at no more than 6% of the budget
- Please take this into consideration when developing your budget.
|
|
91
|
- For districts applying for grants-
- Must submit a letter of intent to DESE by 5:00 PM on January 7, 2008.
- Plan must be submitted to DESE by 5:00 PM on March 3, 2008.
- If you don’t sent in the letter of intent, you will not be able to
apply for a grant. So, mark your
calendar!!
|
|
92
|
- Let’s take time to answer any further questions the group may have at
this time.
|
|
93
|
- If you have any questions about General Supervision, the Improvement
Planning process, or the IMACS system, please contact your RPDC
consultant or DESE for help.
|