Vol. 41, No. 54

August 17, 2007

CONTACT:  JIM MORRIS
Director, Public Information
573-751-3469

Students Post Gains on 2007 State "MAP" Tests

Missouri students posted small to moderate gains in reading and math at all grade levels on this year’s state-required MAP tests, state education officials said today.

At the state level, African-American students also made a small gain in narrowing the gap with white students by making faster progress toward meeting annual goals.

Last spring, students in all Missouri public schools took the Missouri Assessment Program tests in communication arts and mathematics. The tests are required for all students in grades 3-8. The communication arts exam also is given in grade 11; the math exam in grade 10.

The test results are used by the state to evaluate public schools for accreditation purposes and to satisfy the accountability requirements of federal law (the No Child Left Behind Act).

"The investment our state is making in education is paying off with Missouri students making gains in their performance on this year's MAP tests," Gov. Matt Blunt said.  "There is still much work to be done and that is why education will remain my highest priority.  As Missouri's governor I have signed budgets over the last three years to increase education funding by more than half a billion dollars.  Our children hold the keys to the future and it is imperative that we help provide the educational resources they need to succeed and compete in our global economy."

"Overall, I am pleased with this year’s MAP results," said Stan Johnson, assistant commissioner of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. "We see positive change in the percentage of students scoring at the ‘proficient’ or ‘advanced’ levels in nearly every subject and every grade. We also have moderate state-level gains in the middle grades (6-8), where our scores have been flat in recent years," he said.

The rate of progress, however, is not fast enough in many schools to meet the "adequate yearly progress" (AYP) targets that are required under federal law. As a result, more public schools in the state will be identified this year as not meeting the ever-increasing AYP goals. More schools also will be identified as "needing improvement" or some other type of corrective action.

This year, about 190 school buildings that receive federal "Title I" funding will be identified as "needing improvement," compared to 130 schools last year.

To meet the 2007 AYP goal, 42.9 percent of the students in a school had to score at the proficient or advanced level in communication arts. For math, the target was 35.8 percent. These requirements apply to all students and to nine subgroups, including minority students, students with disabilities, students who are learning English, and children from low-income families.

At the state level, Missouri students as a whole successfully met the AYP targets in both communication arts and math. However, only two subgroups – white students and Asians/Pacific Islanders – met the state’s AYP goals.

While African-American students did not meet the AYP goals, their rate of progress this year exceeded that of white students in both communication arts and mathematics, Johnson said.

###

Missouri Assessment Program State Results, 2006 and 2007

Year

Content Area

Grade

Accountable

Below Basic

Pct

Basic

Pct

Proficient

Pct

Advanced

Pct

2006

Comm. Arts

03

65,440

5,699

8.8

31,000

47.9

16,976

26.2

11,104

17.1

2007

Comm. Arts

03

67,391

6,273

9.4

31,374

47

17,538

26.3

11,523

17.3

2006

Comm. Arts

04

65,935

6,916

10.6

29,316

44.8

19,223

29.4

10,030

15.3

2007

Comm. Arts

04

66,054

6,863

10.5

28,601

43.6

18,804

28.7

11,314

17.3

2006

Comm. Arts

05

66,788

5,987

9

29,900

45.1

19,999

30.1

10,450

15.8

2007

Comm. Arts

05

66,201

5,446

8.3

28,395

43.2

19,853

30.2

12,083

18.4

2006

Comm. Arts

06

67,810

7,931

11.8

30,350

45.2

21,649

32.2

7,281

10.8

2007

Comm. Arts

06

67,154

7,502

11.3

29,579

44.4

21,558

32.3

8,037

12.1

2006

Comm. Arts

07

71,666

9,693

13.7

29,872

42.4

22,072

31.3

8,865

12.6

2007

Comm. Arts

07

68,530

8,893

13.2

27,928

41.3

22,702

33.6

8,083

12

2006

Comm. Arts

08

73,637

6,568

9

35,276

48.5

19,808

27.2

11,116

15.3

2007

Comm. Arts

08

71,301

6,154

8.7

34,466

48.8

19,381

27.5

10,565

15

2006

Comm. Arts

11

61,696

6,162

10.2

28,394

47.1

19,092

31.7

6,631

11

2007

Comm. Arts

11

63,064

6,422

10.4

29,579

47.8

19,974

32.3

5,876

9.5

2006

Mathematics

03

65,417

4,699

7.2

31,856

48.8

21,947

33.7

6,712

10.3

2007

Mathematics

03

67,358

4,872

7.3

31,540

47

23,696

35.3

6,938

10.3

2006

Mathematics

04

65,930

5,429

8.3

31,334

47.7

22,893

34.8

6,101

9.3

2007

Mathematics

04

66,081

5,334

8.1

30,713

46.7

23,379

35.5

6,385

9.7

2006

Mathematics

05

66,795

5,381

8.1

31,939

48

22,080

33.2

7,196

10.8

2007

Mathematics

05

66,177

5,050

7.7

29,709

45.1

22,076

33.5

9,063

13.8

2006

Mathematics

06

67,810

7,472

11.1

29,895

44.3

23,536

34.9

6,557

9.7

2007

Mathematics

06

67,037

7,469

11.2

26,865

40.3

24,000

36

8,403

12.6

2006

Mathematics

07

71,651

12,443

17.5

27,570

38.8

23,643

33.3

7,444

10.5

2007

Mathematics

07

68,537

11,466

16.8

25,411

37.3

22,936

33.7

8,245

12.1

2006

Mathematics

08

73,638

15,468

21.2

27,860

38.2

20,583

28.2

9,091

12.5

2007

Mathematics

08

71,300

15,250

21.6

26,069

36.9

19,220

27.2

10,160

14.4

2006

Mathematics

10

69,276

16,678

24.4

22,711

33.2

21,977

32.1

7,065

10.3

2007

Mathematics

10

69,605

16,515

24

24,013

34.9

22,506

32.7

5,704

8.3

As of 08/13/2007